Posts Tagged ‘Jimmy Saville’

All these paedophile’s from Thatcher era only now being dug out. How many still being protected?

April 25, 2015

Sent to the Daily Express 22/4/15

Original:

Ann Widdecombe makes a valid point about Janner being unable to defend himself but also references Leon Brittan as being unable to defend himself, by virtue of being deceased.
Strangely, there hasn’t been much printed on Leon Brittan, whereas there are others, who are also unable to defend themselves, who have been freely discussed in The Media.
Cyril Smith is unable to defend himself, by virtue of being dead, but his guilt is accepted, by all. Most of the Media seem perfectly happy to speak of him as a proven paedophile.
Jimmy Saville, has been the subject of extensive media exposure and has even triggered a whole series of investigations of cover-ups and other offender’s.
Is there a difference in the scale of alleged offences, or is it simply a matter of political connections.
If, Janner is unable to stand trial, why not simply place the allegedly, irrefutable evidence in The Media?
Let’s see if other’s come forward with further evidence, as has been done with various non-political figures.

 

Published version 24/4/15:

 

If Janner is so ill make the case against him public

ANN Widdecombe makes a valid point about Greville Janner being unable to defend himself (“Janner should have faced court earlier”, April 22). “

But there are others, who are also unable to defend themselves, who have been freely discussed in the media.

Cyril Smith is unable to defend himself, by virtue of being dead but his guilt is accepted by all and most of the media seem happy to speak of him as a paedophile.

Jimmy Savile has been the subject of extensive media exposure and has even triggered a whole series of investigations.

If Janner is unable to stand trial due to advanced dementia which makes him unaware of what is going on, why not simply publish the allegedly irrefutable evidence?

Let’s see if others come forward to present further evidence for or against him.

@Daily_Express Is the establishment closing ranks to protect their paedophiles?

October 25, 2012

On a day when it is reported that the number of offences related to Jimmy Saville is rising fast;
on a day when it is being reported that Ken Clarke has been threatening Blogs, which mention offences being committed by someone inside Number 10;
on a day when it is reported that nine more abuser’s of young girl’s have been arrested in Rochdale;
on this day, it is reported that high court judges have decided that paedophiles also have human rights and should be protected.
Sir John Thomas, one of the judges, effectively ruled that paedophiles deserved respect for their privacy and family lives and should be able seek to prevent the implementation of Sarah’s Law.
Ignore the question of whether such people, having destroyed the Human rights of innumerable people, deserve to be accorded such rights.
This is a “stifling act”; an attempt to persuade those who have yet to come forward that it would be pointless to do so.
We don’t need an offender’s register, we need a Judiciary that doesn’t consider offender’s human right to privacy to be comparable to the right of children to be physically abused and traumatised for life.