@guardiannews Are the spook’s really entitled to be concerned about Snowden’s?

Reference the Spooks argument against Snowden I.e. that the revelation of their techniques aids the enemy.

I’ve just watched a program about the taping of conversations between German Officers at Trent House in WWII.

The program ended with the revelation that in order to keep this technique secret (i.e. bugging prisoners accomodation !!!), they did not release the evidence, which they had gathered, to the Nuremberg war crimes commission.

Consequently none of the perpetrators, under their surveillance stood trial.

Military intelligence, they call it.

What is the point of their activities if it is effectively nullified by their need to keep them secret.

We’re no better off than if they hadn’t existed.


Tags: , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: